A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
评分后将魔法满屋从3改为4:如果魔法满屋是3，其他近期看的电影不就得是2了吗？只剩下动画片是让我能全程微笑的了。211114
大数据与AI逆变的元素与概念都有些old cliché. 算是热热闹闹的温馨片吧
【7.5-】比《失控玩家》主题更明确，也更可爱
里面有些设定有点创意，但整个故事看下来一般般
3.5，罗恩还是很萌的，但整体没有太耀眼的地方
后半场基本一直断断续续的哭。
3.5 很暖很感人 讽刺得也很棒 私自窃取用户隐私信息 网络的匿名性 网络暴力…有些桥段还是太幼稚太套路了 结尾小白消失也有点强行了 而且整体创新不够多 明明是帮助人们社交的工具最后却阻碍了人们社交 小白很可爱
评分后将魔法满屋从3改为4:如果魔法满屋是3，其他近期看的电影不就得是2了吗？只剩下动画片是让我能全程微笑的了。211114
前面该哭的地方都很配合地哭了，设想结尾会多么令人感动，所以看到结尾时有点惊掉下巴。男主一个任性鲁莽的小男孩是怎么突然有了救世情结？为什么要替所有人增加一个机器好朋友要是有人压根不需要呢？毫无准备的拔高主题让我觉得这片滑向了无脑科技黑，男主的形象原来已经堆得高高的了也瞬间坍塌，失望
流水线上的佳作 无功无过 反派实在是太像库克了
●我看前面虽然一直跟着乐呵，但是也一直有想“主角会不会太单向对待阿荣”，结果中期电影就点出来了：朋友是双向的。真好。
每个人想要的，就是一个哆啦A梦吧。不是人类，不会离开，专属于我，永远贴心。哎，人类科学家加油吧，赶紧满足我们这种需求
you are my best friends out of box
对科技公司的形象设计也是有问题，盯着库克喷干什么，人家是苹果公司的呀，扎克伯格才是社交软件的巨头啊。
7.5 主题不错 算是对智能手机的讽刺！？一个个网络社交牛逼症 但真正面对面的交流却越来越少…故障机反而更像一个真正的人，而不像其他一样只是冷冰冰的数据…毕竟不管爱情 友情都是需要时间和交流培养的…也顺带讽刺了一下大数据环境下个人隐私的安全问题…但最后明显有虎头蛇尾了…男主强行把大家都重装不合适，自己的觉醒会更好…
3.5看完之后我老公在非常欢快地跳舞 没想到跳的还挺好看的！
电子化程序化人工智能化的“朋友” 爸爸和奶奶从路边买回来的损坏二手 进入cloud刷掉所有
[2021.10.25 @IS激光IMAX] 粤语版
Be friend远比Be my friend来的深刻
探索什么是真正的友谊，反思现代社会人类深陷社交网络不可自拔的现状。就像现在的我们，只会盯着手机屏幕，忘了去认识屏幕以外那些实实在在的人。高科技造福人类生活，但也有时候也让我们失去了一些东西。题材不算新鲜，但故事还是讲得不错的。Ron在床底下发光这幕太暖了，想起Baymax了，它就是小白了，喜欢这种与众不同、有可爱个性的机器人，喜欢日常生活出现反套路的事物，太有意思了，是异类又怎样！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
